keybroad: (Ignore)
Lotus ❊ ([personal profile] keybroad) wrote2017-05-04 09:20 pm

6 999s + 3 Ushiromiyas (TNDG Day 6)

((CONTENT WARNING: Extremely dubious and detailed discussion of teenager's assisted suicide in the Help A Robot thread??? There is also a lot of yelling in some of the other threads that has dubious properties due to domestic context IT'S BEEN A MONTH SINCE THIS LOG AND I WASN'T IN ALL THE THREADS SO PEOPLE PLEASE HELP ME IF THERE ARE CONTENT WARNINGS I AM NOT INCLUDING...))

[It is the morning after the tattoo game and the ominous vote distribution. Breakfast of milkshakes and whatever else people brought is set out on a conference table in the sci-fi set. Through the doorways, from the room where these people all sleep, there is a faint smoke from the candle at the shrine for Seven, a counter with a portrait, water, and fruit.

Lotus lifts her eyebrows once everyone is there.]


Hip hip hooray, let's face the day.

[personal profile] meatitfeedson 2017-05-08 10:35 pm (UTC)(link)
I think the basis of it is a good idea, but June has a good point. We don't want to look too aggressive, and some people might take that the wrong way. The only ones who might possibly vote for him at this point would be the other Americans. Most of which don't seem to actually care about him. I doubt they would waste their singular votes on him, when they could use those to trade and keep themselves safe. They were quick to denounce him after all.

But even so, we can't account for stupidity. Posting something like that could be a good idea. The only problem is signing our names to it. That might come across too aggressive, and as if the nine of us are trying to control things.
exequte: (well first I had to get some cash)

[personal profile] exequte 2017-05-08 10:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Posting something anonymously sounds like a good idea. I don't know if we'd be able to find a typewriter, but wouldn't there probably be stencils in the prop room? Those could be used as well.

If we're going to do it that way, though, then we'd want the message to be as aggressive as possible. That's how people would listen to it, after all.
meatitfeedson: (384234io)

[personal profile] meatitfeedson 2017-05-08 11:05 pm (UTC)(link)
I think not giving them fair notice would be taken worse than an anonymous message declaring that intent. They could always argue they didn't know they should steer clear of him, considering no one has said it directly.

If you're worried about the writing, then we just won't use our own hand. Say "This is a petition to ask all members of the community not to vote for Frank Reynolds. If anyone should, the rest of us may liken this to harbouring a fugitive and therefore a punishable action."

[personal profile] meatitfeedson 2017-05-08 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)
I can do that. I'll draft something up and run it by everyone to finalise.